June 16 2019 Nyt Power Lawyers Reviews 2019 Reviews

American federal prosecutor

John Durham
Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice
Incumbent
Causeless office October 19, 2020
Appointed by	William Barr
Preceded by	Position established
United states of america Chaser for the District of Connecticut
In office Feb 22, 2018 – February 28, 2021 Interim: Oct 28, 2017 – February 22, 2018
President	Donald Trump Joe Biden
Preceded by	Deirdre G. Daly
Succeeded by	Leonard C. Boyle (interim)
In function Acting: January 20, 1997 – June 30, 1998
President	Pecker Clinton
Preceded past	Christopher F. Droney[1]
Succeeded by	Stephen C. Robinson
Personal details
Born	John Henry Durham (1950-03-16) March 16, 1950 (age 72) Boston, Massachusetts, U.Southward.
Political party	Republican[2]
Education	Colgate University (BA) University of Connecticut Schoolhouse of Police force (JD)
Awards	Chaser General's Award for Exceptional Service Chaser General's Award for Distinguished Service

John Henry Durham (built-in March 16, 1950)^{[3] [4] [5]} is an American lawyer who served as the U.s.a. Attorney for the District of Connecticut (D.C.) from 2018 to 2021. By April 2019, he had been assigned to investigate the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.Southward. elections, and in October 2020 he was appointed special counsel for the Department of Justice on that matter, a position he yet holds.

He previously served as an banana U.S. chaser in various positions in D.C. for 35 years.^[6] He is known for his part as special prosecutor in the 2005 destruction of interrogation tapes created by the Key Intelligence Agency (CIA), during which he decided not to file whatever criminal charges related to the destruction of tapes of torture at a CIA facility.^[3] Past April 2019, U.S. Chaser General William Barr had tasked Durham with overseeing a review of the origins of the Russian federation investigation and to determine if intelligence collection involving the Trump campaign was "lawful and advisable".^{[7] [viii]} Barr disclosed in December 2020 that he had elevated Durham's condition to special counsel in October, ensuring that his investigation could continue afterward the Trump administration ended.^{[ix] [ten]}

Early life and educational activity [edit]

Durham was born in Boston, Massachusetts. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University in 1972 and a Juris Doctor from the Academy of Connecticut School of Law in 1975.^{[11] [3]} After graduation, he was a VISTA volunteer for two years (1975–1977) on the Crow Indian Reservation in Montana.^[12]

Career [edit]

Connecticut state authorities [edit]

After Durham'due south volunteer work, he became a state prosecutor in Connecticut. From 1977 to 1978, he served as a Deputy Banana State'southward Attorney in the Office of the Chief State's Attorney. From 1978 to 1982, Durham served as an Banana State's Chaser in the New Haven Country's Chaser's Office.^[12]

Federal government [edit]

Following those five years as a state prosecutor, Durham became a federal prosecutor, joining the U.S. Attorney'south Office for the District of Connecticut.^[11] From 1982 to 1989, he served as an attorney and then supervisor in the New Haven Field Office of the Boston Strike Force in the Justice Department's Organized Crime and Racketeering Section. From 1989 to 1994, he served equally Chief of the Part'southward Criminal Division. From 1994 to 2008, he served as the Deputy U.S. Attorney, and served every bit the U.S. Attorney in an interim and interim chapters in 1997 and 1998.^{[12] [xiii]}

In December 2000, Durham revealed hole-and-corner Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents that convinced a judge to vacate the 1968 murder convictions of Enrico Tameleo, Joseph Salvati, Peter J. Limone and Louis Greco because they had been framed by the bureau. In 2007, the documents helped Salvati, Limone, and the families of the two other men, who had died in prison, win a $101.7 million civil judgment against the regime.^[fourteen]

In 2008, Durham led an inquiry into allegations that FBI agents and Boston Law had ties with the mafia.^[15] He also led a series of loftier-profile prosecutions in Connecticut against the New England Mafia and corrupt politicians, including old governor John 1000. Rowland.^[fourteen]

From 2008 to 2012, Durham served as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.^[12]

On Nov 1, 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney for Connecticut.^[16] On February 16, 2018, his nomination was confirmed past voice vote of the Senate. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018.^[12]

Attorney General William Barr secretly appointed Durham Special Counsel on October xix, 2020.^[17]

Durham resigned as U.Due south. Attorney effective February 28, 2021.^{[half dozen]} He was ane of 56 remaining Trump-appointed U.Due south. Attorneys President Joe Biden asked to resign in February 2021.^[18] He remains Special Counsel every bit of September 2021.^[eighteen]

Appointments as special investigator [edit]

Whitey Bulger case [edit]

Amongst allegations that FBI informants James "Whitey" Bulger and Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi had corrupted their handlers, US Attorney General Janet Reno named Durham special prosecutor in 1999. He oversaw a task force of FBI agents brought in from other offices to investigate the Boston office's handling of informants.^[14] In 2002, Durham helped secure the conviction of retired FBI amanuensis John J. Connolly Jr., who was sentenced to x years in prison on federal racketeering charges for protecting Bulger and Flemmi from prosecution and alert Bulger to abscond just before the gangster'south 1995 indictment.^[14] Durham'southward task force also gathered evidence against retired FBI agent H. Paul Rico who was indicted in Oklahoma on state charges that he helped Bulger and Flemmi kill a Tulsa businessman in 1981. Rico died in 2004 earlier the case went to trial.^[fourteen]

CIA interrogation tapes destruction [edit]

In 2008, Durham was appointed by Attorney Full general Michael Mukasey to investigate the devastation of CIA videotapes of detainee interrogations.^{[nineteen] [xx] [21]} On Nov eight, 2010, Durham closed the investigation without recommending whatsoever criminal charges be filed.^[22] Durham's final report remains secret but was the subject of an unsuccessful lawsuit nether the Freedom of Information Act filed by The New York Times reporter Charlie Cruel.^[23]

Torture investigation [edit]

In Baronial 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Durham to lead the Justice Department's investigation of the legality of CIA's use of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" in the torture of detainees.^[24] Durham'south mandate was to look at only those interrogations that had gone "beyond the officially sanctioned guidelines", with Attorney General Holder maxim interrogators who had acted in "practiced organized religion" based on the guidance constitute in the Torture Memos issued by the Bush-league Justice Department were non to exist prosecuted.^[25] Later in 2009, University of Toledo constabulary professor Benjamin G. Davis attended a conference where former officials of the Bush assistants had told conference participants shocking stories, and accounts of illegality on the part of more senior Bush officials.^[26] Davis wrote an appeal to one-time Bush officials to take their accounts of illegality directly to Durham. A criminal investigation into the deaths of 2 detainees, Gul Rahman in Afghanistan and Manadel al-Jamadi in Iraq, was opened in 2011. It was closed in 2012 with no charges filed.^{[27] [28]}

Special counsel to review origins of Trump-Russia investigation [edit]

Beginning in 2017, President Trump and his allies alleged that the FBI investigation (known as Crossfire Hurricane) of possible contacts betwixt his associates and Russian officials (which led to the Mueller investigation) was a "hoax" or "witch chase" that was baselessly initiated by his political enemies. In April 2019, Attorney Full general William Barr appear that he had launched a review of the origins of the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections^{[29] [30]} and it was reported in May that he had assigned Durham to pb it several weeks earlier.^[7] Durham was given the authority "to broadly examin[eastward] the authorities's drove of intelligence involving the Trump campaign'south interactions with Russians," reviewing government documents and requesting voluntary witness statements.^[7] In Dec 2020, Barr revealed to Congress that he had secretly appointed Durham special counsel on October 19.^[17] He stayed on in this chapters after he resigned equally U.S. Attorney.^[18] The U.S. Justice Department'south beginning official expenditure report for the special investigation showed that information technology had spent $1.5 million from Oct 19, 2020, to March 31, 2021; Durham was not required to report expenditures fabricated earlier being designated special counsel.^[31]

Every bit of November 2021 Durham had secured single-count indictments against two Americans for making a faux statement, and a five-count imitation statement indictment against a Russian national.^{[32] [33] [34]}

Investigation into origins of FBI investigation "Crossfire Hurricane" [edit]

On October 24, 2019, information technology was reported that what had been a review of the Russian federation investigation was now a criminal probe into the affair. The Justice Department could now utilize subpoena power for both witness testimony and documents. Durham also had at his disposal the power to convene a 1000 jury and file criminal charges, if needed.^{[35] [36]} The New York Times reported on November 22 that the Justice Department inspector general had made a criminal referral to Durham regarding Kevin Clinesmith, an FBI chaser who had altered an email during the process of acquiring a wiretap warrant renewal on Carter Page, and that referral appeared to exist at least part of the reason Durham's investigation was elevated to criminal status.^[37] On Baronial 14, 2020, Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a felony violation of altering an email used to maintain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants. He inverse an e-mail to falsely add together a claim that Page was "non a source" for the CIA, to a argument by the CIA liaison that Carter Folio had a prior operational relationship with the CIA from 2008 to 2013.^{[38] [39]} The Page warrants began in October 2016, months after the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened, so Clinesmith'southward activeness and indictment were unrelated to the original ground of Durham's investigation into the origins of the FBI investigation.^{[40] [41]}

The day Justice Department inspector full general Michael Horowitz released his report on the 2016 FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which found the investigation was properly predicated and debunked a number of conspiracy theories regarding its origins,^{[42] [43]} Durham issued a statement saying, "nosotros do not concord with some of the study's conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened."^{[44] [45]} Many observers within and outside the Justice Section, including the inspector general, expressed surprise that Durham would issue such a statement, as federal investigators typically do not publicly comment on their ongoing investigations.^{[46] [47]} Barr also released a statement challenging the findings of the report.^[48] Horowitz later testified to the Senate that prior to release of the report he had asked Durham for any data he had that might change the report's findings, but "none of the discussions changed our findings."^[49] The Washington Post reported that Durham could non provide evidence of any setup by American intelligence.^[50]

The New York Times reported in December 2019 that Durham was examining the part of former CIA director John Brennan in assessing Russian interference in 2016, requesting emails, call logs and other documents. Brennan had been a vocal critic of Trump and a target of the president's accusations of improper activities toward him. The Times reported Durham was specifically examining Brennan's views of the Steele dossier and what he said almost it to the FBI and other intelligence agencies. Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper had testified to Congress that the CIA and other intelligence agencies did not rely on the dossier in preparing the January 2017 intelligence community cess of Russian interference, and allies of Brennan said he disagreed with the FBI view that the dossier should be given meaning weight, as the CIA characterized it as "internet rumor."^[51] The Times reported in Feb 2020 that Durham was examining whether intelligence community officials, and specifically Brennan, had concealed or manipulated evidence of Russian interference to achieve a desired result. FBI and NSA officials told Durham that his pursuit of this line of enquiry was due to his misunderstanding of how the intelligence community functions.^[52] Durham interviewed Brennan for viii hours on Baronial 21, 2020, later on which a Brennan advisor said Durham told Brennan he was not a subject or target of a criminal investigation, but rather a witness to events.^[53]

The New York Times reported in September 2020 that Durham had also sought documents and interviews regarding how the FBI handled an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.^[54] The FBI had investigated the Foundation and other matters related to Hillary Clinton, but had establish no footing for prosecution, nor did John Huber, a U.S. chaser appointed by Trump'due south starting time attorney general Jeff Sessions, after a two-twelvemonth investigation ending in January 2020.^{[55] [56]}

On November ii, 2020, the day earlier the presidential election, New York magazine reported that:

According to ii sources familiar with the probe, there has been no bear witness found, afterward 18 months of investigation, to back up Barr's claims that Trump was targeted by politically biased Obama officials to preclude his ballot. (The probe remains ongoing.) In fact, the sources said, the Durham investigation has so far uncovered no evidence of whatsoever wrongdoing by Biden or Barack Obama, or that they were even involved with the Russia investigation.^[57]

Indictment of attorney [edit]

On September 16, 2021, Durham indicted Michael Sussmann, a partner for the law house Perkins Coie, alleging he falsely told FBI general counsel James Baker during a September 2016 coming together that he was not representing a client for their discussion. Durham alleged Sussman was actually representing "a U.S. Technology Manufacture Executive, a U.Southward. Cyberspace Visitor and the Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign." Sussmann focuses on privacy and cybersecurity police force and had approached Baker to discuss what he and others believed to exist suspicious communications between computer servers at the Russian Alfa-Bank and the Trump Organization. Sussmann had represented the Autonomous National Committee regarding the Russian hacking of its computer network. Sussmann'south attorneys accept denied he was representing the Clinton campaign. Perkins Coie represented the Clinton presidential entrada, and one of its partners, Marc Elias, commissioned Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on Trump, which led to the production of the Steele dossier. Sussmann, a former federal prosecutor, characterized the allegations against him equally politically motivated and pleaded not guilty the day after his indictment.^{[58] [59] [33]} Equally with the charge against Clinesmith, the charge against Sussmann was unrelated to the FBI investigation into links betwixt Trump associates and Russian officials, which began in July 2016.

During a 2018 congressional deposition, Baker stated, "I don't retrieve [Sussmann] specifically saying that he was acting on behalf of a detail client," though the Durham investigation found handwritten notes taken by banana managing director of the FBI Counterintelligence Sectionalisation Bill Priestap which paraphrase Bakery telling him after the meeting that Sussmann "said non doing this for whatsoever client." The notes also say "Represents DNC, Clinton Foundation, etc.," though they did not say Sussmann told Bakery this during the meeting; Baker had likewise said during his deposition that he was generally familiar with Sussmann's work, as they were friends. The Priestap notes plant hearsay and it was not articulate if they would be admissible in courtroom as testify under the hearsay rule.^{[59] [60]}

The New York Times reported Durham had records showing Sussmann had billed the Clinton campaign for certain hours he spent working on the Alfa-Bank affair. His attorneys said he did and then because he needed to demonstrate internally that he was engaged in billable piece of work, though the work involved consulting with Elias, and the campaign paid a apartment monthly fee to Perkins Coie but was not actually charged for those billed hours.^[59]

In a December 2021 court filing, Sussmann's attorneys presented portions of two documents provided to them by Durham days before which they asserted undermined the indictment. One document was a summary of an interview Durham'due south investigators conducted with Baker in June 2020 in which he did non say that Sussmann told him he was not in that location on behalf of whatsoever client, only rather that Baker had assumed information technology and that the issue never came up. A second document was a June 2019 Justice Department inspector general interview with Baker in which he said the Sussmann meeting "related to strange interactions that some number of people that were his clients, who were, he described as I recall information technology, sort of cybersecurity experts, had institute." The New York Times reported that the narrow charge against Sussmann was contained in a 27-page indictment that elaborated on activities of cybersecurity researchers who were non charged, including what their attorneys asserted were selected email excerpts that falsely portrayed them as not really believing their claims. Trump and his supporters seized on that information to assert the Alfa-Banking concern matter was a hoax devised by Clinton supporters and so the Trump-Russia investigation had been unjustified. Sussmann'due south attorneys told the court that the new show "underscores the groundless and unprecedented nature of this indictment" and asked that his trial date be moved from July to May 2022.^[61] A Durham prosecutor later asserted that subsequent to his 2019 and 2020 interviews, Baker "affirmed and then re-affirmed his now-clear recollection of the accused'due south false statement" after refreshing his retentiveness with contemporaneous or nearly-contemporaneous notes.^[62]

In a February 2022 court move related to Sussmann's prosecution, Durham alleged that Sussmann associate Rodney Joffe and his associates had "exploited" capabilities his company had through a pending cybersecurity contract with the Executive Office of the President (EOP) to learn nonpublic government Domain Name Organisation (DNS) and other information traffic "for the purpose of gathering derogatory data about Donald Trump." Joffe was not charged and his attorney did not immediately comment.^[63] Later on Sussmann's September 2021 indictment, The New York Times reported that in improver to analyzing suspicious communications involving a Trump server, Sussmann and analysts he worked with became aware of information from a YotaPhone — a Russian-made smartphone rarely used in the United States — that had accessed networks serving the White Firm, Trump Tower and a Michigan hospital visitor, Spectrum Health. Like the Alfa-Bank server, a Spectrum Health server also communicated with the Trump Arrangement server. Sussmann notified CIA counterintelligence of the findings in February 2017, just it was non known if they were investigated.^[64] Durham alleged in his Feb 2022 court motion that Sussmann had claimed his data "demonstrated that Trump and/or his assembly were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations," but Durham said he institute no testify to support that. Sussmann'southward attorneys responded that Durham knew Sussman had not made such a claim to the CIA.^[65] Durham alleged Sussmann's data showed a Russian telephone provider connection involving the EOP "during the Obama administration and years before Trump took function." Attorneys for an analyst who examined the YotaPhone data said researchers were investigating malware in the White House; a spokesman for Joffe said his client had lawful access under a contract to analyze White House DNS data for potential security threats. The spokesman asserted Joffe'south piece of work was in response to hacks of the EOP in 2015 and of the DNC in 2016, as well as YotaPhone queries in proximity to the EOP and the Trump campaign, that raised "serious and legitimate national security concerns most Russian attempts to infiltrate the 2016 election" that was shared with the CIA. Durham asserted that Sussmann bringing his information to the CIA was part of a broader effort to enhance the intelligence community'southward suspicions of Trump'south connections to Russia shortly after he took office. Durham did not criminate that whatever eavesdropping of Trump communications content occurred, nor did he assert the Clinton entrada was involved or that the declared DNS monitoring activity was unlawful or occurred afterwards Trump took office.^{[66] [67] [68]}

Durham's filing triggered a furor among right-wing media outlets, including misinformation about what Durham had alleged, which was challenged by other outlets and lawyers for the involved parties.^{[66] [67] [69] [lxx]} Play tricks News falsely reported that Durham claimed Hillary Clinton's entrada had paid a technology visitor to "infiltrate" White House and Trump Tower servers; that narrative actually came from Trump ally Kash Patel.^[71] The Washington Examiner claimed that this all meant there had been spying on Trump's White Business firm function. Charlie Savage of The New York Times disputed these claims and explained that "Mr. Durham's filing never used the word 'infiltrate.' And information technology never claimed that Mr. Joffe's company was being paid past the Clinton entrada."^[67] Sussmann'southward attorneys asserted Durham's motion contained falsehoods "intended to further politicize this example, inflame media coverage, and taint the jury pool" as part of a blueprint of Durham'southward behavior since Sussmann's indictment.^[72] Durham objected to a motility by Sussmann'south attorneys to have the "factual background" section struck from Durham's motion, stating that "If tertiary parties or members of the media have overstated, understated, or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the Government's Movement, that does not in whatever style undermine the valid reasons for the Regime's inclusion of this data."^{[73] [74]}

Hillary Clinton responded to the right-wing media attacks by hinting at defamation: "Information technology's funny the more trouble Trump gets into the wilder the charges and conspiracy theories about me seem to get. Fox leads the accuse with accusations against me, counting on their audience to autumn for it again. As an aside, they're getting clumsily shut to bodily malice in their attacks."^{[75] [76]}

Sussmann'due south attorneys also explained that "Although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmann's February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Bureau-ii with (Executive Office of the President) data from after Mr. Trump took office, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-two pertained just to the period of fourth dimension before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President,"^[66] a fourth dimension catamenia (2015 and 2016) where much investigation of Russian hacks of Democratic Party and White House networks had occurred: "...cybersecurity researchers were 'deeply concerned' to find data suggesting Russian-fabricated YotaPhones were in proximity to the Trump entrada and the White House, so 'prepared a report of their findings, which was later on shared with the C.I.A'."^{[67] [77]}

During a March 2022 court hearing, presiding judge Casey Cooper remarked that Durham'due south February motion relating to Joffe created a "dustup" that "strikes me as a sideshow in many respects," adding "I don't know why the information is in there." He said the motion, which was ostensibly about a potential conflict of involvement matter, could take been quickly resolved in a brief hearing. Cooper then asked Sussmann if he would waive the conflict of interest issue, which Sussmann did, leading Cooper to say, "I didn't need any of that ancillary data to practise that." Cooper declined to strike the ancillary information as Sussmann'due south attorneys had requested, saying he would non ascribe any motives to Durham's motion.^[78]

In an April 2022 flurry of late-night courtroom filings by the prosecution and defense prior to the trial beginning the next month, Durham presented a text message Sussmann sent to Bakery the night before their coming together which read, "I'm coming on my own — not on behalf of a customer or company — want to help the bureau," which appeared to support Durham's allegation that Sussmann had lied to investigators. The New York Times reported that Durham's filings suggested he might introduce at trial the Steele dossier in an effort to suggest a broader conspiracy betwixt Sussmann and the Clinton entrada. Durham's indictment did non mention the dossier, and Sussmann'due south attorneys argued Durham "should not be permitted to plow Mr. Sussmann's trial on a narrow false statement charge into a circus full of sideshows that will only fuel partisan fervor." Durham argued that Sussmann'southward team should not be allowed at trial to suggest any political motivation behind the prosecution. Sussmann's attorneys asked estimate Cooper to dismiss the case if Joffe were non granted immunity to provide "critical exculpatory testimony" for Sussmann.^[79]

Alfa Bank investigation [edit]

CNN reported later in September that the Durham k jury had subpoenaed documents from Perkins Coie. CNN had viewed emails between Sussmann and others who were researching the server communications, including Joffe, showing that Durham's indictment of Sussmann cited only portions of the emails. The indictment included an unidentified researcher stating in an email, "The just thing that drive[southward] us at this bespeak is that nosotros merely practise non like [Trump]." CNN'southward review of other emails indicated the researchers later on broadened the scope of their test for presentation to the FBI. Joffe'southward chaser asserted the indictment contained reddish-picked information to misrepresent what had transpired.^[80] Defense lawyers for the scientists who researched the Alfa Bank-Trump internet traffic said that Durham's indictment is misleading and that their clients stand by their findings.^[81]

Indictment of Steele dossier source [edit]

On November iv, 2021, Russian national Igor Danchenko was arrested and indicted on allegations he made five simulated statements to the FBI. Danchenko was a major source for the Steele dossier which made controversial allegations about Trump and was used by the FBI to secure a surveillance warrant confronting former Trump campaign aide Carter Page later on he had left the campaign. The Steele dossier was not used as a basis to open the FBI investigation into links between Trump associates and Russian officials.^{[34] [82]}

The indictment alleged Danchenko lied by maxim he had not discussed the dossier with an unnamed U.S.-based public relations executive, identified by his attorney as Charles Dolan, Jr., a longtime political associate of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Durham alleged Danchenko used Dolan as a source for the dossier, though Dolan's chaser said he was a witness in the case. The indictment suggested, though did not directly assert, that Dolan may have been a source of the dossier allegation that a video existed of Trump having a liaison with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel. The indictment noted that Dolan was given a bout of that hotel in June 2016, including the presidential suite Trump stayed in during the alleged 2013 see.^[83] The Washington Post reported presently after Danchenko'southward indictment that Dolan had worked in public relations for Russia for 8 years ending 2014. Later on the Steele dossier was publicly released by Buzzfeed News in January 2017, Dolan emailed a Russian client, whose web server company was later implicated in the Autonomous National Committee cyber attacks, stating, "I'm hoping that this is exposed as fake news. I may be wrong merely I have doubts about the authenticity."^[84]

Danchenko pleaded not guilty to the charges and a trial was scheduled for Apr 2022.^[85]

Awards and accolades [edit]

In 2011, Durham was included on The New Republic'southward list of Washington's most powerful, least famous people.^[86]

In 2004, Durham was decorated with the Chaser General'south Award for Exceptional Service and, in 2012, with the Chaser General's Award for Distinguished Service.^{[87] [88]}

Personal life [edit]

According to CNN, Durham is "press-shy" and is known for his trend to avoid the media.^[89] United States Attorney Deirdre Daly once described him equally "tireless, fair and aggressive" while United States Senator Chris Murphy characterized him as "tough-nosed ... apolitical and serious".^[89]

Run across also [edit]

• Mueller report
• Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United states elections
• Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (2019)
• Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russian federation (2020–2021)
• Trump–Ukraine scandal

References [edit]

1. ^ "About the Office". justice.gov. March 18, 2015.
2. ^ Mahony, Edmund H. (October 27, 2017). "John Durham Named Interim U.S. Attorney; Presidential Nomination Expected". Hartford Courant . Retrieved October 24, 2019.
3. ^ ^{a b c} Lewis, Neil A. (Jan 13, 2008). "Prosecutor Who Unraveled Corruption in Boston Turns to C.I.A. Tape Example". The New York Times . Retrieved July x, 2017.
4. ^ "Committee Questionnaire" (PDF).
5. ^ Ford, Lois Mitchell (1979). Descendants of David Mitchell of Burnton, Laurencekirk, Kincardineshire, Scotland.
6. ^ ^{a b} "U.S. Attorney For Connecticut John Durham Resigns". NBC Connecticut. Feb 26, 2021. Retrieved June eleven, 2021.
7. ^ ^{a b c} Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Fandos, Nicholas (May fourteen, 2019). "Scrutiny of Russia Investigation Is Said to Be a Review, Non a Criminal Inquiry". The New York Times . Retrieved May 17, 2019.
8. ^ Balsamo, Michael (May 14, 2019). "AP source: Barr launches new wait at origins of Russia probe". Associated Press . Retrieved Feb xiv, 2022.
9. ^ Tucker, Eric; Balsamo, Michael (Dec 1, 2020). "Barr appoints special counsel in Russia probe investigation". The Seattle Times . Retrieved September 9, 2021.
10. ^ Balsamo, Michael (February 27, 2021). "Durham remains special counsel overseeing Trump-Russia probe". Associated Press . Retrieved September 9, 2021.
11. ^ ^{a b} James, Randy (August 26, 2009). "CIA Corruption Investigator John Durham". Time . Retrieved July 10, 2017.
12. ^ ^{a b c d e} "John H. Durham Sworn in as United States Attorney". United States Department of Justice. February 22, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
13. ^ McBride, Jessica (May 14, 2019). "John H. Durham: 5 Fast Facts Yous Demand to Know". Heavy.com. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
14. ^ ^{a b c d e} Murphy, Shelley (January 7, 2008). "US prosecutor's tenacity is rewarded". Boston.com. (subscription required)
15. ^ Politi, Daniel (January 3, 2008). "The Jump Off". Slate . Retrieved Feb 14, 2022.
16. ^ Mahony, Edmund H. (November 1, 2017). "President Trump Nominates John Durham To Exist U.S. Attorney". Hartford Courant . Retrieved November 1, 2017.
17. ^ ^{a b} Roughshod, Charlie (December 1, 2020). "Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Research". The New York Times . Retrieved June 11, 2021.
18. ^ ^{a b c} Balsamo, Michael (June eleven, 2021). "Justice Dept. seeks resignations of Trump-era US Attorneys". Associated Printing.
19. ^ Shapiro, Lila (Baronial 24, 2009). "'Inhumane' CIA Terror Tactics Spur Criminal Probe". Huffington Mail.
20. ^ Mikkelsen, Randall (January 2, 2008). "U.S. launches criminal probe into CIA tapes". Reuters . Retrieved Baronial 30, 2021. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
21. ^ Apuzzo, Matt (January 3, 2008). "Veteran prosecutor takes over CIA probe". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
22. ^ Mazzetti, Mark; Savage, Charlie (November 9, 2010). "No Criminal Charges Sought Over C.I.A. Tapes". New York Times . Retrieved October 14, 2011.
23. ^ Fell, Charlie (May 10, 2018). "Gina Haspel's Testimony Virtually C.I.A. Torture Raises New Questions". The New York Times . Retrieved June 22, 2018. Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Haspel were later investigated by John Durham, an assistant U.s.a. attorney. Mr. Durham ultimately recommended filing no charges over the tape destruction, but his report laying out his findings and reasoning is secret. (The New York Times lost a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to make information technology public.)
24. ^ Johnson, Carrie (Baronial 25, 2009). "Holder Hires Prosecutor to Expect Into Alleged CIA Interrogation Abuses". The Washington Post . Retrieved May 6, 2010.
25. ^ Serwer, Adam (Baronial 31, 2012). "Investigation of Bush-league-era Torture Concludes With No Charges". Mother Jones . Retrieved May 14, 2019.
26. ^ Davis, Benjamin G. (September 25, 2009). "Torture Tales: Calling John Durham". JURIST. Archived from the original on September 24, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
27. ^ Shane, Scott (August thirty, 2012). "Holder Rules Out Prosecutions in C.I.A. Interrogations". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
28. ^ "Argument of Chaser General Eric Holder on Closure of Investigation into the Interrogation of Certain Detainees". justice.gov. August 30, 2012. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
29. ^ Johnson, Kevin (May xiv, 2019). "Attorney Full general taps height Connecticut federal prosecutor for review of Trump-Russia inquiry". USA TODAY . Retrieved May 17, 2019. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
30. ^ Goldman, Adam; Vicious, Charlie; Schmidt, Michael S. (May thirteen, 2019). "Barr Assigns U.S. Chaser in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russian federation Inquiry". The New York Times . Retrieved May xiv, 2019.
31. ^ Strohm, Chris (May 28, 2021). "Special Counsel Spends $1.5 Million in Probe of Russia Inquiry". Bloomberg News . Retrieved June 11, 2021.
32. ^ Lucas, Ryan (January 29, 2021). "Ex-FBI Lawyer Sentenced To Probation For Actions During Russian federation Investigation". NPR . Retrieved Nov 6, 2021.
33. ^ ^{a b} Polantz, Katelyn (September 17, 2021). "Michael Sussmann, lawyer charged in Durham probe, pleads not guilty". CNN . Retrieved November 6, 2021.
34. ^ ^{a b} Cohen, Zachary; Perez, Evan; Polantz, Katelyn (Nov 4, 2021). "Authorities abort analyst who was source for Steele dossier". CNN . Retrieved Nov half-dozen, 2021.
35. ^ Dunleavy, Jerry (Oct 25, 2019). "John Durham opens criminal research in DOJ's investigation of the investigators". Washington Examiner . Retrieved October 25, 2019.
36. ^ Benner, Katie; Goldman, Adam (October 24, 2019). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Open Criminal Inquiry Into Its Own Russia Investigation". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
37. ^ Goldman, Adam; Savage, Charlie (November 22, 2019). "Russia Enquiry Review Is Said to Criticize F.B.I. but Rebuff Claims of Biased Acts". The New York Times.
38. ^ Kalmbacher, Colin (August 14, 2020). "Here's What We Know About 'FBI Chaser 2' Kevin Clinesmith, the First Person Charged in Durham Probe". Police force & Crime . Retrieved Baronial 30, 2021.
39. ^ Polantz, Katelyn; Shortell, David (Baronial 14, 2020). "Former FBI lawyer set to plead guilty to altering email during Russian federation investigation". CNN . Retrieved September 9, 2021.
40. ^ Shortell, By Jeremy Herb and David (July 21, 2018). "FBI releases Carter Folio surveillance warrant documents | CNN Politics". CNN.
41. ^ Goldman, Adam; Cruel, Charlie; Schmidt, Michael S. (May xiv, 2019). "Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry". The New York Times.
42. ^ David Shortell, Evan Perez, Marshall Cohen and Katelyn Polantz (Dec nine, 2019). "Inspector full general: Showtime of FBI Russian federation probe was justified and unbiased but investigation had significant errors". CNN. CNN. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved Dec 8, 2020. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
43. ^ Berman, Dan (December 9, 2019). "Takeaways from the inspector general's written report into the FBI's Russian federation investigation". CNN. CNN. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
44. ^ Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Benner, Katie (December 9, 2019). "Report on F.B.I. Russia Inquiry Finds Serious Errors but Debunks Anti-Trump Plot". The New York Times.
45. ^ "Argument of U.S. Attorney John H. Durham". justice.gov. December nine, 2019. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
46. ^ Zapotosky, Matt; Barrett, Devlin (Dec 16, 2019). "John Durham has a stellar reputation for investigating abuse. Some fear his work for Barr could tarnish it". Washington Post.
47. ^ Williamson, Elizabeth (December 23, 2019). "Durham Surprises Even Allies With Statement on F.B.I.'s Trump Case". The New York Times . Retrieved Nov 20, 2020.
48. ^ "Argument by Attorney Full general William P. Barr on the Inspector General's Study of the Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI'due south Crossfire Hurricane Investigation". justice.gov. December 9, 2019. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
49. ^ Gerstein, Josh; Bertrand, Natasha (Dec eleven, 2019). "Horowitz pushes back at Barr over basis for Trump-Russia probe". Politician . Retrieved Baronial xxx, 2021.
50. ^ Zapotosky, Matt (Dec iv, 2019). "Barr's handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can't back right-fly theory that Russia case was U.Due south. intelligence setup". The Washington Mail service.
51. ^ Benner, Katie; Barnes, Julian E. (December 19, 2019). "Durham Is Scrutinizing Ex-C.I.A. Director's Role in Russian Interference Findings". The New York Times.
52. ^ Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Barnes, Julian E. (February thirteen, 2020). "Justice Dept. Is Investigating C.I.A. Resistance to Sharing Russia Secrets". The New York Times . Retrieved February 29, 2020.
53. ^ Tucker, Eric (Baronial 22, 2020). "Ex-CIA chief Brennan interviewed in Russia probe review". Associated Press . Retrieved Baronial xxx, 2021.
54. ^ Goldman, Adam; Rashbaum, William G.; Hong, Nicole (September 24, 2020). "In Politically Charged Research, Durham Sought Details About Scrutiny of Clintons". The New York Times.
55. ^ Devlin Barrett; Matt Zapotowski (January 9, 2020). "Justice Dept. winds downwards Clinton-related inquiry in one case championed by Trump. It found nothing of effect". The Washington Post.
56. ^ Romboy, Dennis (June 4, 2020). "Trump calls Utah U.S. attorney 'garbage disposal unit' for ending Clinton probe". Deseret News.
57. ^ Waas, Murray (Nov 2, 2020). "How Trump and Barr'south Oct Surprise Went Bust". New York . Retrieved November 4, 2020.
58. ^ Ken Dilanian; Tom Wintertime (September sixteen, 2021). "Special counsel named by Trump DOJ charges Democratic lawyer with false statement". NBC News . Retrieved November vi, 2021.
59. ^ ^{a b c} Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Schmidt, Michael S.; Rashbaum, William Thou. (September fourteen, 2021). "Durham Is Said to Seek Indictment of Lawyer at Firm With Democratic Ties". The New York Times . Retrieved October 1, 2021.
60. ^ Wittes, Benjamin (September twenty, 2021). "On the Special Counsel's Weird Prosecution of Michael Sussmann". Lawfare . Retrieved November 6, 2021.
61. ^ Savage, Charlie (December vii, 2021). "Defendant in Example Brought by Durham Says New Evidence Undercuts Charge". The New York Times.
62. ^ Savage, Charlie (December 9, 2021). "More Evidence Muddles Durham'south Case on Lawyer's Meeting With F.B.I." The New York Times.
63. ^ Neidig, Harper (February 14, 2022). "Durham alleges cyber analysts 'exploited' access to Trump White House server". The Hill.
64. ^ Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam (September thirty, 2021). "Trump Server Mystery Produces Fresh Disharmonize". The New York Times.
65. ^ Cohen, Marshall (February 16, 2022). "Unspooling the latest twists in special counsel John Durham's investigation". CNN.
66. ^ ^{a b c} Katelyn Polantz; Evan Perez (February fourteen, 2022). "Special counsel Durham alleges Clinton campaign lawyer used data to enhance suspicions nigh Trump". CNN.
67. ^ ^{a b c d} Savage, Charlie (February 14, 2022). "Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Rail". The New York Times.
68. ^ Alexander Mallin; Jack Date (February xv, 2022). "Special counsel, Democratic lawyer clash over new allegations regarding data purported to necktie Trump to Russia". ABC News.
69. ^ Alexander Mallin; Jack Appointment (February 15, 2022). "Special counsel, Democratic lawyer disharmonism over new allegations regarding data purported to tie Trump to Russian federation". ABC News.
70. ^ Crash-land, Philip (February sixteen, 2022). "Fox News's Durham narrative survives the emergence of inconvenient details". The Washington Post.
71. ^ Bump, Philip (Feb xiv, 2022). "Why Trump is again claiming that he was spied upon in 2016". The Washington Post.
72. ^ Tucker, Eric (February 15, 2022). "EXPLAINER: How the latest Trump-Russia filing generated buzz". Associated Press.
73. ^ Barbarous, Charlie (February 17, 2022). "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing". The New York Times.
74. ^ Kessler, Glenn (February eighteen, 2022). "How the right embraced the false claim that Hillary Clinton 'spied' on President Donald Trump". The Washington Postal service.
75. ^ Griffiths, Brent; Lahut, Jake; Sheth, Sonam (February 18, 2022). "Hillary Clinton says Play a trick on News is 'awfully close to actual malice' in their coverage of her". Business organisation Insider . Retrieved February 23, 2022.
76. ^ Johnson, Ted (February 17, 2022). "Hillary Clinton On Fox News' Amplification Of "Spying" Claims: "They're Getting Awfully Close To Actual Malice In Their Attacks"". Deadline Hollywood . Retrieved March 20, 2022.
77. ^ MacGuill, Dan (February 22, 2022). "What Did John Durham's Latest Court Filing Say About Trump, Russia, and Clinton?". Snopes. Retrieved Feb 23, 2022.
78. ^ Sonam Sheth; C. Ryan Hairdresser (March x, 2022). "A federal gauge called out John Durham's prosecutors for creating a 'sideshow' with a courtroom filing that sent Trumpworld into a frenzy". Business Insider.
79. ^ Savage, Charlie (April 5, 2022). "More than Evidence Bolsters Durham's Case Against Autonomous-Linked Lawyer". The New York Times.
80. ^ Evan Perez; Katelyn Polantz (September 30, 2021). "Durham issues fresh round of subpoenas in his continuing probe of FBI investigation into Trump, Russia". CNN.
81. ^ Roughshod, Charlie; Goldman, Adam (September 30, 2021). "Trump Server Mystery Produces Fresh Conflict". The New York Times . Retrieved October 1, 2021.
82. ^ Robertson, Lori (March 27, 2019). "Dossier Not What 'Started All of This'". FactCheck.org. Annenberg Public Policy Heart. Retrieved November six, 2021.
83. ^ Devlin Barrett and Tom Jackman (November 4, 2021). "Igor Danchenko arrested, charged with lying to FBI almost information in Steele dossier". The Washington Mail service.
84. ^ Stanley-Becker, Isaac (November vi, 2021). "A spin doctor with ties to Russia allegedly fed the Steele dossier before fighting to discredit information technology". The Washington Mail.
85. ^ "Igor Danchenko pleads non guilty to lying to FBI most Steele dossier". Texarkana Gazette. November 12, 2021.
86. ^ The Editors (Nov 3, 2011). "Washington's Most Powerful, Least Famous People". The New Commonwealth . Retrieved Oct 25, 2011. {{cite mag}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
87. ^ "Attorney General Holder Recognizes Department Employees and Others for Their Service at Annual Awards Anniversary". justice.gov (Press release). U.S. Department of Justice. Oct 17, 2012. Retrieved September 16, 2021.
88. ^ Gura, David (August 24, 2009). "So, Who Is John Durham?". NPR . Retrieved September sixteen, 2021.
89. ^ ^{a b} Cohen, Marshall (May 14, 2019). "US attorney's 'apolitical' reputation on the line as he helps Barr review the Russian federation probe". CNN . Retrieved September 16, 2021.

External links [edit]

• Biography at U.South. Department of Justice

hallneeks1943.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham

Share this post